Going from to
is a lookup. Going back from
to
is not — because most expressions you encounter on the boards do not match a basic pair directly. You have to break them apart first using partial fraction decomposition, and that decomposition step is where the most points are lost in the entire Laplace Transform topic. This post covers all three decomposition cases — distinct linear factors, repeated linear factors, and irreducible quadratic factors — with 10 fully worked problems at exam-level difficulty. This is Part 2 of the Laplace Transform Series.
- EE (Electrical Engineer) — Very high frequency. Partial fractions appear every time a circuit transient problem needs to be inverted back to the time domain, which is every circuit problem in this series.
- ECE (Electronics Engineer) — Very high frequency. Signals problems often hand you
directly and ask for
— partial fractions is the bridge between them in almost every case.
- ME (Mechanical Engineer) — Moderate frequency. Vibration and control system IVPs solved by Laplace all require inversion, which comes back here.
- CE, ChE, GeE, MetE, MinE, Naval Architect and Marine Engineer — Low to rare. Inversion is tested only when a broader Laplace Transform problem requires it, not as a standalone exam topic for these boards.
Bottom line: If you only have time to master two things in this series, make it the basic pairs from Part 1 and the three decomposition cases from this post. These two skills together cover the majority of Laplace Transform points on the EE and ECE boards.
The Inverse Laplace Transform
The inverse Laplace Transform recovers the original time-domain function from its -domain transform. Written formally:
In practice, you rarely compute this using the formal Bromwich integral. Instead, you rewrite as a sum of terms that each match one of the basic pairs from Part 1, then invert term by term using linearity. Partial fraction decomposition is the tool that makes that rewriting possible.
The Three Partial Fraction Cases
Every denominator you will encounter on the boards falls into one of three structural types. Recognizing which case applies before you start is the single most important habit to build for this topic.
One constant per distinct linear factor. Solve by substituting the roots and
to isolate each constant individually.
CASE 2 — REPEATED LINEAR FACTORS
One term for every power of the repeated factor from 1 up to . A single constant for the whole repeated group is the most common structural error on this case.
CASE 3 — IRREDUCIBLE QUADRATIC FACTORS
A quadratic factor that will not factor over the reals gets a linear numerator , not a constant. This case always produces sine and cosine terms in the final time-domain answer.
One rule before you start decomposing: Check whether the degree of is less than the degree of the denominator. If it is equal or higher, do polynomial long division first — partial fractions only work on proper rational functions.
10 Worked Board Exam Problems
Problem 1. Invert a Transform With Two Distinct Linear Factors
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Set up Case 1 decomposition, one constant per distinct linear factor.
Step 2: Clear denominators, then substitute to isolate
and
to isolate
.
Step 3: Rewrite with the found constants.
Step 4: Invert each term using .
Examiner note: Substitution at the roots is always faster than expanding and matching coefficients for distinct linear factors. Save the coefficient-matching method for cases where substitution does not isolate a single constant cleanly.
Problem 2. Invert a Transform With Three Distinct Linear Factors
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Set up Case 1 with three constants, one per factor.
Step 2: Clear denominators, then substitute roots ,
, and
.
Step 3: Rewrite and invert term by term.
Examiner note: , not
. A bare
term inverts to a constant, not a ramp. This is the most common inversion slip when the denominator contains a plain
factor.
Problem 3. Invert a Transform With a Repeated Linear Factor
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Set up Case 2 decomposition — two terms for the squared factor.
Step 2: Clear denominators.
Step 3: Substitute to isolate
, then match coefficients of
to find
.
Step 4: Invert each term. Recall .
Examiner note: , not just
. The squared denominator introduces a factor of
in the time domain, which comes from the
pair shifted by
.
Problem 4. Invert a Transform With a Repeated Factor and a Simple Factor
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Mixed case — repeated factor needs two terms, and the simple factor
needs one.
Step 2: Clear denominators.
Step 3: Substitute roots to isolate and
.
Step 4: Expand and match the coefficient of to find
.
Step 5: Invert all three terms.
Examiner note: When substitution cannot isolate directly, always fall back to expanding and matching coefficients. Never guess — one wrong constant contaminates the entire final answer.
Problem 5. Invert a Transform With an Irreducible Quadratic Factor
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: The denominator does not factor over the reals — this is Case 3. Split the numerator to match the cosine and sine pair shapes.
Step 2: The cosine pair is ready. For the sine pair, force the factor into the numerator by multiplying and dividing.
Step 3: Invert each piece separately.
Examiner note: The sine pair requires in the numerator —
. If your numerator is just 1 or some other constant, multiply and divide by
to force the correct form before inverting.
Problem 6. Invert a Transform With Mixed Linear and Quadratic Factors
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Mixed Cases 1 and 3. The linear factor gets a constant, the quadratic gets a linear numerator.
Step 2: Clear denominators.
Step 3: Substitute to isolate
.
Step 4: With , expand the right side and match coefficients.
Step 5: Invert each term. Note so the exponential term drops out entirely.
Examiner note: is a valid answer — do not second-guess it. When a constant comes out as zero it means that particular factor has no contribution to the final answer. Rechecking the arithmetic on that zero is good practice, but forcing a non-zero value instead is not.
Problem 7. Handle an Improper Rational Function Before Decomposing
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: The numerator and denominator have equal degree — this is improper. Do polynomial long division first.
Step 2: Factor the remainder’s denominator and decompose.
Step 3: The full expression is now in invertible form.
Step 4: Invert each term. The leading is a constant and inverts to
(the Dirac delta, from Part 4), but for most board exam contexts this constant is just noted as a coefficient.
Examiner note: Partial fractions only works when the degree of the numerator is strictly less than the degree of the denominator. If not, long division first — skipping this step and trying to decompose directly will give wrong constants that will not check out when recombined.
Problem 8. Invert a Transform With a Repeated Quadratic Factor
Problem: Find .
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: This does not decompose by simple substitution. Use the known transform pair for this specific form.
Step 2: This is a standard board exam pair that should be recognized directly.
Examiner note: in the denominator is a repeated quadratic factor that appears on the EE and ECE boards specifically in RLC resonance problems. If it appears, check whether it matches the standard pair for
directly before attempting long decomposition.
Problem 9. Identify the Value of a Constant From a Partial Fraction Identity
Problem: Given that , find the value of
.
Given: Partial fraction identity as stated
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Clear denominators on both sides.
Step 2: Substitute to zero out the
term.
Examiner note: This “find the constant” format is the most direct version of the partial fraction skill — the board gives you the decomposition structure already and asks for a single constant. Substitution at the root that eliminates every other term is the fastest path to the answer.
Problem 10. Full Inversion Problem in an EE Circuit Context
Problem: The impedance-transformed current in an RLC circuit is given by . Find
.
Given:
Find:
Solution:
Step 1: Mixed Cases 1 and 3. Quadratic factor gets , linear factor gets
.
Step 2: Clear denominators.
Step 3: Substitute to find
.
Step 4: Expand the right side and match coefficients to find and
.
Step 5: Rewrite with all constants, then invert term by term.
Examiner note: This problem type — from a physical system, three-term mixed decomposition, invert to get the time-domain response — is exactly what appears in EE and ECE circuit transient problems. The math is identical whether the problem says “current in an RLC circuit” or just hands you the fraction directly.
Common Mistakes and Examiner Traps
| ❌ Common Mistake | ✅ Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| Trying to decompose an improper fraction directly without long division first | Always check degree of numerator vs denominator first. If numerator degree |
| Writing only one term for a repeated factor |
A factor |
| Using a constant numerator for a quadratic factor instead of a linear one | An irreducible quadratic factor always gets |
| Inverting |
|
| Inverting |
|
| Forgetting to force |
The sine pair is |
Board Exam Quick Tips
- Classify the denominator before writing anything. Is it distinct linear, repeated, or quadratic? The case determines the structure of the decomposition, and writing the wrong structure means the constants you find will not check out.
- Substitution at the roots is almost always the fastest method for Case 1. For Cases 2 and 3, combine substitution with coefficient matching for the constants that substitution cannot reach.
- Always verify your constants by recombining. Mentally add the partial fractions back together and check that you get the original numerator — one wrong sign here fails the entire problem silently.
- An irreducible quadratic in the denominator always means sine and cosine in the final answer. If you get only exponentials from a problem whose denominator has a quadratic factor, something went wrong.
- If a constant comes out as zero, accept it. A zero constant is a valid answer and means that particular factor contributes nothing to the final
. Do not try to force a non-zero value.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. How do I know which decomposition case to use?
Look at the denominator alone, before the numerator. If all factors are linear and distinct, use Case 1. If any linear factor is repeated (raised to a power), use Case 2 for that factor. If the denominator contains a quadratic that has no real roots (negative discriminant), use Case 3 for that factor. A denominator can mix cases — a repeated linear factor and a quadratic factor in the same denominator requires both Case 2 and Case 3 structure simultaneously.
Q2. What is the discriminant test for an irreducible quadratic?
For , compute
. If this is negative, the quadratic has no real roots and is irreducible — use Case 3 with a linear numerator
. If the discriminant is zero or positive, the quadratic factors into real linear terms and you should factor it first, then use Cases 1 or 2.
Q3. Can I always find all the constants by substituting roots?
For Case 1 (all distinct linear factors), yes — you get exactly one useful substitution per constant. For Case 2 (repeated factors) and Case 3 (quadratic factors), substitution can isolate some constants but not all. You will need to expand the cleared-denominator equation and match coefficients of powers of to find the remaining ones.
Q4. What happens after I complete the partial fraction decomposition?
Each term in the decomposition matches one of the basic inverse pairs from Part 1. Apply linearity to invert term by term. Every Case 1 term becomes an exponential, every Case 2 term involving involves
, and every Case 3 term involving
becomes sine or cosine.
Q5. What is the difference between and
?
(a constant equal to 1).
(a ramp). In general,
. The power of
in the denominator directly controls the power of
in the time-domain result.
What is Next
You can now move from back to
for any rational function the boards are likely to put in front of you. In Part 3, the direction of the problem shifts again — instead of inverting a given
, you will use the Laplace Transform to solve initial value problems directly. The derivative transform formulas turn the ODE into an algebraic equation for
, you solve that algebra, and then you apply exactly what you learned in this post to invert
back to
. Parts 1 and 2 together are the complete toolkit for Part 3.
→ Continue to Part 3 — Laplace Transform of Derivatives, Integrals, and Solving ODEs
→ Back to the Laplace Transform Series Index
Published by PinoyBIX.org — Engineering Education for Every Filipino Student. Electronics · Mathematics · Board Exam Review · Free for Everyone.
P inoyBIX educates thousands of reviewers and students a day in preparation for their board examinations. Also provides professionals with materials for their lectures and practice exams. Help me go forward with the same spirit.
“Will you subscribe today via YOUTUBE?”
TIRED OF ADS?
- Become Premium Member and experienced complete ads-free content browsing.
- Full Content Access to Premium Solutions Exclusive for Premium members
- Access to PINOYBIX FREEBIES folder
- Download Reviewers and Learning Materials Free
- Download Content: You can see download/print button at the bottom of each post.
PINOYBIX FREEBIES FOR PREMIUM MEMBERSHIP:
- CIVIL ENGINEERING REVIEWER
- CIVIL SERVICE EXAM REVIEWER
- CRIMINOLOGY REVIEWER
- ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING REVIEWER (ECE/ECT)
- ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & RME REVIEWER
- FIRE OFFICER EXAMINATION REVIEWER
- LET REVIEWER
- MASTER PLUMBER REVIEWER
- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING REVIEWER
- NAPOLCOM REVIEWER
- Additional upload reviewers and learning materials are also FREE
FOR A LIMITED TIME
If you subscribe for PREMIUM today!
You will receive an additional 1 month of Premium Membership FREE.
For Bronze Membership an additional 2 months of Premium Membership FREE.
For Silver Membership an additional 3 months of Premium Membership FREE.
For Gold Membership an additional 5 months of Premium Membership FREE.
Join the PinoyBIX community.


